Image for Exploring Counter-Narratives: Adjusting the Lens Through Which You View Your Students

Exploring Counter-Narratives: Adjusting the Lens Through Which You View Your Students

Exploring Counter-Narratives: Adjusting the Lens Through Which You View Your Students

Viewing a student through a lensHave you ever wondered why you can recall the lyrics from jingles you sang along to as a child? For instance, most 80s babies will remember, “My buddy, my buddy. Wherever I go he goes.” This is not happenstance, in fact, it’s intentional. According to the Forbes Ad Council, on any given day we are bombarded with between 6,000-10,000 advertisements. We are exposed to more advertisements than there are minutes in a day! This inundation undoubtedly influences our thoughts, decisions, and preferences. Likewise, students spend roughly six and a half hours per day in school for most of the year. The nursery rhymes, stories, histories and narratives that are shared in learning environments throughout a learner’s K-12 experience, shape their preferences and beliefs about themselves and others.

Both the media and education industries contribute to how we show up in the world and in our classrooms. Think back on your own educational experience. How many Black or Indigenous scientists did you learn about? Had you learned about the Tulsa Massacre before HBO taught you over this past year? Was the “High on the Hog” Netflix series the first time you learned about Thomas Downing’s oyster cellars and how African American cuisine played a large role in transforming America? This too, like media messages, is an intentional legacy of White-centered education in America that leaves both students and teachers robbed from learning about the wealth of contributions by Black and Brown people to this country. Instead of learning this rich and diverse history, we often were presented with false or incomplete histories and deficit beliefs about students of color. 

Muslim girl and another student interactSo how do we create the robust, multifaceted learning environments our students deserve? We do this by introducing counter-narratives. According to Dr. Arnetha Ball of Stanford University, counter-narratives are strategies for bringing the stories and life experiences of those who are often on the outskirts of society into our classrooms with the purpose of critiquing traditionally accepted narratives. Why is this critique so important? Counter-narratives are an important tool in disrupting the programming around historically marginalized students, and a strategy to counter the dominant narrative in the classroom by learning from and with our students. I suggest you check out Chimamanda Adichie’s TED Talk to hear her experience firsthand. 

Counter-narratives can be a powerful solution to the pervasive concern of low student engagement. Here are a few questions to ponder:

  1. How might students show up in school if they were encouraged to share their stories?
  2. What if classroom learning shifted from being unilateral to omni-directional? 
  3. What if we assumed that our students were collaborators in creating rich, engaging learning experiences where everyone, including the teacher, could grow? 

Truthfully, some students have low or no participation in our classrooms because they sense that their lived experience is excluded from the curriculum, resources, and pedagogy. 

smiling Black girl in her classroomAs you begin to explore the concept of counter-narratives and the role it plays in educational equity, here are some simple ways to begin shifting your practice: 

  1. Accept that you are biased. We all have biases–  bias simply means a lack of neutrality, leaning towards one side or another. Take time to reflect on those biases and ask where those ideas originated and challenge them with the truth. 
  2. Expose yourself to stories and narratives that are written by Black and Brown authors that center historically marginalized students. As the African proverb goes, “Until the Lion tells his side of the story, the tale of the hunt will always glorify the Hunter.”
  3. Create space for students to share their lived experiences. Our students bring a wealth of untapped knowledge into the classroom. How can their lived experiences be leveraged to teach the content?

I’d love to hear your thoughts on ways you’ve begun to shift your practice, or even strategies you’ve brought into your classroom. You can email me at rohiatousiby@linclearning.com or find me on Twitter @Siby_Rohiatou. Be sure to check back here for some great upcoming blogs and resources from more of our LINC coaches. 

Reimagining and Designing Equitable Classrooms that Work for All Learners

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, Belonging We’re at a pivotal moment of change in education where we can recalibrate and reimagine what education can mean for Black, Brown, and White students. Now more than ever, we are aware that the way we were doing education was missing the mark for many students, especially for students on the margins. (I would argue it was missing the mark for White students as well.) Education B.C. (Before Covid) suggested to Black and Brown students that their stories did not matter and that they were not an integral part of the making of America. It suggested to white students that almost everything (if not everything) was imagined and created only by people that resembled their pigmentation and that there was nothing to be gained from learning anything different. Fortunately, we are now in a position to use our imagination to shape who we want to be(come) as practitioners, examine what learning means to our students (not to us), and how we can create real equity in education. This shift will allow Black and Brown students to feel included and expose white students to learning experiences that are reflective of the culturally and linguistically diverse world that we live in.

Webster’s Dictionary defines imagination as “to form a mental image of something not present.” Imagining educational experiences for our students that may not be present yet can take on a variety of forms. When we think about the agency generated by our students as they learned from home using multiple devices and applications, how can we continue to embrace this digital learning using virtual educational tools to motivate and encourage an interactive and supportive learning environment? We have an opportunity, and some would say an obligation, to challenge our traditional pedagogical practices and make them responsive, relationship-focused, and personalized. Yes, this means that cell phones, TikTok, and Instagram may become part of our standard classroom materials.

Equity is every student getting what they needSo what becomes possible if we don’t focus on students taking a test, but instead expect students to be co-producers of knowledge in the classroom? Dr. Ladson-Billings asserts that “students learn a lot more than we can test.” Imagine students becoming excited to know that their ability to think is intentionally being nurtured by asking them thought-provoking questions that consider the students’ context (e.g. community, experiences, family, etc.), igniting a wondering and curiosity within students to want to explore more. We are in a perfect position to cultivate educational environments where students can fall in love with learning in and outside of the classroom. These environments must provide evidence to Black and Brown students that they belong and will be cared for. What might that evidence look like? What evidence would you want to see if you were a student of color?

What can we do now to facilitate learning that encourages students to understand their own culture and acquire new skills in at least one other culture? These cross-cultural skills support our students with the ability to communicate with respect, recognize and appreciate others’ values while celebrating their own values. Not dismissing their native language or dialect but, instead, how we can include it as an option when learning. For example, language-based code-switching is about finding effective ways to communicate with another person in a language or style that puts that person at ease (Tatum). Imagine if we validated students who code-switched naturally (it is a skill) and we afforded them the opportunity to apply it in their learning. What if students were given the option to infuse it into their writing? For example, could we give students the option to use “their” language for less formal writing such as journaling? Imagine validating students’ ability to code-switch and honing their ability to know when to apply that skill, making them more effective communicators when writing or speaking, effectively becoming Bilingual.

A word cloud on equity and social justiceFinally, what is the “why” for our students? If last year taught us nothing else, it taught us that we are all looking for a purpose. Our students are no different. They are now questioning “why” they have to go back to school when they can learn from home and “why” they need to do their homework. Learning must be purposeful, meaningful, and relevant if we want students to be thoughtfully involved. We must know how the learning connects to and is reflective of the world that our students live in, including their communities, their families, and their future. Students want to produce work that reveals the fabric of their community and solve problems that are important to them right now.

Let’s use this upcoming school year to be courageous and activate our creativity to expand our pedagogical approaches and subject area expertise beyond the narrow constraints of testing. Let’s co-design and co-produce the “why” of learning with students to create reimagined learning opportunities and classrooms that cultivate a culture of belonging for all students.

Spend a few minutes and allow your imagination to run wild with creativity for a new day in education. I would love to hear your thoughts and ideas of what you are imagining for the new school year. Connect with me on Twitter @CCThaddies or via email at cassondrathaddies@linclearning.com. Let’s spark some ideas for the world!

What Our Students Learned (NOT LOST!) During the Pandemic

student working through remote learningAs a mom of three kids and a professional working in the education innovation field, this has been an intensely challenging year. While we engage in many conversations about what we lost during this pandemic, and we cannot understate the loss in terms of life, I’d like to focus on what our students learned during the pandemic.

We saw an unparalleled leap forward in innovation that enabled more student voice, choice, and autonomy. For the past decade, I’ve worked on transforming American classrooms into more student-centered and personalized learning environments. This has often been an uphill battle, fighting against many entrenched practices and resistance to change. The silver lining of the pandemic is that many of these desired shifts were forced upon our educational system by the need for remote and hybrid learning.

As school systems worked diligently to shift rapidly to virtual teaching, educators and leaders offered students more voice in decision making. Students gained flexibility with a move away from seat-time requirements into asynchronous models where they had a choice over when, where, and how they completed work. With this move away from in-class seat time, we developed an understanding that learning can take place in all types of environments and that by offering these different learning opportunities, some students flourished in ways they were not able to in traditional classrooms. We saw that when students drive their own learning, they can do amazing things. Students thrive when teachers respect their choices and understand their needs. Students could demonstrate their mastery through invention, projects, and alternative assessment methods in a move away from standardized testing.

We saw teachers engage students who were normally quiet or in the shadows by using collaborative tools such as Google Docs or Jamboard. These tools enable teachers to engage all students, sometimes allowing for anonymous posting, rather than asking for volunteers which often engaged the same group of students who felt comfortable sharing in a large group. This is just one example of alternative engagement opportunities facilitated by ed-tech tools that worked for a broader set of students.

Students gained independence over their schedules and loved it. My own daughter flourished with the additional freedom remote learning offered. As a result, we should rethink our bathroom, break, food, and other policies which honor students’ ability to make good choices and create a more flexible learning environment. We also saw families gain more tools to support their students. We’ve seen families, particularly of students of color, who recognized how poorly our education systems have served their children in the past with substandard instruction and more aggressive discipline. They have discovered other educational options for their children to learn which better met their needs. These families were able to take back some control and choice, and they won’t go back to the old “normal.” We need to continue pushing for equity in our classrooms!

This collection of experiences helped us to imagine a new education paradigm. We have a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to make a bold change and leave behind the old normal, replacing it with an improved system that offers students more voice, choice, and autonomy in their learning, preparing them for the world they will face as they enter the workforce. I hope we don’t turn back but move forward boldly. I’d love to hear your thoughts on what students learned in the pandemic.

Reach out to me on Twitter @jenniferawolfe or via email jenniferwolfe@linclearning.com.

Building Student-Agency in Hybrid and Remote Classrooms

“I want my students to be more independent” and “I want my students to develop more intrinsic motivation.” These are comments I’m hearing from teachers across the country regardless of the model of instruction they are working in.  Most teachers I work with initially believe that the first step to developing student agency is to offer classroom structures like more student choice or “early finisher work”. And yet even with those structures in place, we still have students, including high-performing students, who come to us and say “Ms. Schuster, tell me what to do next?” For teachers who have been trying to develop student agency, a comment like this is always a blow to the gut. But why does it keep it happening? I believe the key to solving this challenge is to focus on classroom culture, not just structures.

When I talk to teachers about this dilemma, one that has become a more urgent need during remote and hybrid instruction, I ask them about what culture they have developed around student self-efficacy and collaboration. Are they explicitly having conversations with their students about why self-efficacy as a student is important? Are they explaining to students how they can practice those skills? And, are they highlighting best practices when students are taking more ownership in their classrooms?  This is where I see a lightbulb go off and they say “Hmm, I don’t know if I’ve done that.”

Peter Drucker, a business author and consultant, once said, “Culture eats strategy for breakfast” – meaning that if your culture is not in place, whatever strategy you are trying to implement in your organization, group or classroom, will not be successful. If our hope is to further develop student agency, to truly have self-directed, collaborative learners (our strategy), we can’t just think about systems and routines, we need to develop the culture in our classrooms first. 

At LINC, we define classroom culture as “the way of thinking, behaving, and working that exists in a classroom” or more simply put, student mindset

 

Don’t Let Perfect Be the Enemy of Trying Anything

I sat with a teacher a few weeks ago that was confronted with a very common classroom challenge – how to create more differentiation in her classroom to better reach all of her students. She was worried that her struggling learners were not receiving adequate support from her. I could tell immediately from our conversation that she was a committed teacher – hardworking, diligent, dedicated. Her issue was not lack of effort or desire.

I learned that she was spending the majority of her class time in the whole group model of instruction – with very little time available for more targeted small groups. As this was a school that recently rolled out a blended learning initiative, I recommended that the teacher consider trying a Station Rotation which would allow for various grouping strategies by skill, modality, independence readiness, or interest. This would help her achieve her goal of more differentiation and targeted, small group instruction.

While I shared this strategy with her, I began to see a look of angst and frustration come over her face. Then she shared almost in anguish, “everything you’re saying sounds great and I think I could do it but it would take me five hours to plan a lesson like this. I have my own two kids and a husband at home who need my attention.”

This wasn’t the response that I was expecting, but I knew exactly how the teacher felt. When moving into a new kind of practice especially one that requires a different type of planning or in some cases more initial set up, it can seem daunting with already limited time and resources. This situation was further complicated because this was a teacher who was highly-esteemed in a high-achieving school. Doing anything in her class that was short of impeccable felt like a nonstarter.

This wasn’t a teacher that was resistant to doing a Station Rotation model in her classroom. It was a teacher who was resistant to doing a Station Rotation imperfectly in her classroom. This was a case where her desire for perfection had become an impediment to trying something new.

In the Model of Generative Change, (Dr. Arnetha Ball, Stanford University Graduate School of Education) one of the key stages of professional development is internalization. This is the process through which a new skill or strategy is attempted enough to become a sustained part of our practice. It is also the recognition that the first times we try anything new, we will likely not be very good at it. For internalization to happen, we must be willing to accept and even reward ourselves for not being immediately great and still choosing to innovate. Trying a Station Rotation, Flipped Classroom, Playlists, or any new practice is just like when we were learning to ride a bike or learning a new instrument. It takes some time to become proficient and this is an uncomfortable place for any person, especially one used to being confident in her skill set.

For the next few minutes, we focused on what it looks like to try something new and confronting the discomfort. We also discussed that in a blended classroom, perfection is not the goal, but instead generativity – where we are in a continuous state of reflection and iteration in our practice. We discussed some strategies in which she could incrementally practice a Station Rotation classroom through small group pullouts, starting with a fewer number of stations, and spreading the stations out over a couple of days. This could allow her to start with a little less of a daunting lift in the beginning.

We closed out the conversation reaffirming what could be possible for those struggling learners if she were to try some of these strategies. Her reservation was replaced with a cautious optimism and a commitment to trying this new practice. It is amazing what becomes possible when we don’t let perfect become the enemy of trying something new.

Learn more about how Learning Innovation Catalyst is empowering educators through the methodology of Generative Change. www.lincspring.com